<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for OSS Watch team blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp</link>
	<description>open source software innovation support centre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The dominance of open source tools in Big Data by Analytics Reconnoitre: Notes on Open Solutions in Big Data from #esym12 JISC CETIS MASHe</title>
		<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2012/05/15/the-dominance-of-open-source-tools-in-big-data/comment-page-1/#comment-281848</link>
		<dc:creator>Analytics Reconnoitre: Notes on Open Solutions in Big Data from #esym12 JISC CETIS MASHe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/?p=1539#comment-281848</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Graduating Apache Rave project demonstrates open innovation in software by What makes a community led project work? at OSS Watch team blog</title>
		<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2012/04/10/graduating-apache-rave-project-demonstrates-open-innovation-in-software/comment-page-1/#comment-277661</link>
		<dc:creator>What makes a community led project work? at OSS Watch team blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/?p=1498#comment-277661</guid>
		<description>[...] portal engine, supporting (Open)Social Gadgets as well as WC3 widgets&#8217;. As Sander observes in this blog, the Rave ecosystem is made up of a &#8216;diverse range of collaborators&#8217; from both the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] portal engine, supporting (Open)Social Gadgets as well as WC3 widgets&#8217;. As Sander observes in this blog, the Rave ecosystem is made up of a &#8216;diverse range of collaborators&#8217; from both the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Source Junction 3: mobile and cloud, Oxford 20-21 March 2012 by Open Source Junction 3: Mobile Technologies and the Cloud &#124; DevCSI &#124; Developer Community Supporting Innovation</title>
		<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2012/02/23/open-source-junction-3-mobile-and-cloud-oxford-20-21-march-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-258630</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source Junction 3: Mobile Technologies and the Cloud &#124; DevCSI &#124; Developer Community Supporting Innovation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/?p=1453#comment-258630</guid>
		<description>[...] You can find our more about the event at the event webpage and read the full coverage from the event at on their live blog. Gabriel Hanganu also provides a useful overview of the issues in this blog post about the event. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can find our more about the event at the event webpage and read the full coverage from the event at on their live blog. Gabriel Hanganu also provides a useful overview of the issues in this blog post about the event. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Software sustainability != project sustainability by What I&#8217;ve starred this month: February 28, 2012 &#8211; MASHe</title>
		<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2012/02/10/software-sustainability-project-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-240471</link>
		<dc:creator>What I&#8217;ve starred this month: February 28, 2012 &#8211; MASHe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/?p=1446#comment-240471</guid>
		<description>[...] February 11, 2012 5 Essential Spreadsheets for Social Media Analytics &#8211; February 11, 2012 Software sustainability != project sustainability at OSS Watch team blog &#8211; February 11, 2012 Science of the Invisible: Student feedback using Google+ &#8211; February [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] February 11, 2012 5 Essential Spreadsheets for Social Media Analytics &#8211; February 11, 2012 Software sustainability != project sustainability at OSS Watch team blog &#8211; February 11, 2012 Science of the Invisible: Student feedback using Google+ &#8211; February [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Manage your research data safely with open source by DataFlow new release at OSS Watch team blog</title>
		<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2011/10/28/manage-your-research-data-safely-with-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-231218</link>
		<dc:creator>DataFlow new release at OSS Watch team blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/?p=1366#comment-231218</guid>
		<description>[...] mentioned in an earlier post, DataFlow is an Oxford-based project in the JISC UMF programme building a data management [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mentioned in an earlier post, DataFlow is an Oxford-based project in the JISC UMF programme building a data management [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nginx and the Open Core model by Andrew Katz</title>
		<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2012/01/06/nginx-and-the-open-core-model/comment-page-1/#comment-222436</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Katz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/?p=1412#comment-222436</guid>
		<description>@Mike - yes, agreed. I&#039;m surprised to see any open core development still in action, to be honest; I thought the idea was debunked a couple of years ago.

It seems to combine the worst of both worlds. For example, one joy of open source software is that you don&#039;t have to worry about how many copies you are running, or do licence audits. Not true with open core, if you have any closed extensions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike &#8211; yes, agreed. I&#8217;m surprised to see any open core development still in action, to be honest; I thought the idea was debunked a couple of years ago.</p>
<p>It seems to combine the worst of both worlds. For example, one joy of open source software is that you don&#8217;t have to worry about how many copies you are running, or do licence audits. Not true with open core, if you have any closed extensions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nginx and the Open Core model by Mike Schinkel</title>
		<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2012/01/06/nginx-and-the-open-core-model/comment-page-1/#comment-220061</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Schinkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/?p=1412#comment-220061</guid>
		<description>You mentioned &quot;Ideological Opposition&quot; with the Open Core model but what you didn&#039;t mention is something I call &quot;Pragmatic Opposition.&quot; I view pragmatic opposition as being related to interest in the full defacto-standardization of a platform.

If there is a cost to selected extensions then the vast majority of users won&#039;t be using those extensions. As open-source alternatives are released the business supporting the platform will see it as in their best interest to deflect interest in the open-source alternatives to ensure the alternative is not viewed as the platform&#039;s defacto-standard. 

Making matters worse is when multiple alternatives emerge and then important aspects of the platform becomes fragmented. Sadly, It&#039;s Unix all over again (or today maybe I should say &quot;Android.&quot;) 

So while ideological opposition certainly gets the press because of how people love to read about conflict orchestrated by larger-than-life personalities, I believe pragmatic opposition is more important from a business decision-making perspective. 

Which leads me to be very sad that Nginx chose an open core model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mentioned &#8220;Ideological Opposition&#8221; with the Open Core model but what you didn&#8217;t mention is something I call &#8220;Pragmatic Opposition.&#8221; I view pragmatic opposition as being related to interest in the full defacto-standardization of a platform.</p>
<p>If there is a cost to selected extensions then the vast majority of users won&#8217;t be using those extensions. As open-source alternatives are released the business supporting the platform will see it as in their best interest to deflect interest in the open-source alternatives to ensure the alternative is not viewed as the platform&#8217;s defacto-standard. </p>
<p>Making matters worse is when multiple alternatives emerge and then important aspects of the platform becomes fragmented. Sadly, It&#8217;s Unix all over again (or today maybe I should say &#8220;Android.&#8221;) </p>
<p>So while ideological opposition certainly gets the press because of how people love to read about conflict orchestrated by larger-than-life personalities, I believe pragmatic opposition is more important from a business decision-making perspective. </p>
<p>Which leads me to be very sad that Nginx chose an open core model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FOSS Focus by dan mcquillan</title>
		<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2011/12/01/foss-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-206569</link>
		<dc:creator>dan mcquillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 23:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/?p=1387#comment-206569</guid>
		<description>i came across the chdk via the awesome balloon mapping projects; if you don&#039;t know them, there&#039;s more detail here:

http://publiclaboratory.org/tool/balloon-mapping
http://grassrootsmapping.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i came across the chdk via the awesome balloon mapping projects; if you don&#8217;t know them, there&#8217;s more detail here:</p>
<p><a href="http://publiclaboratory.org/tool/balloon-mapping" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/publiclaboratory.org');">http://publiclaboratory.org/tool/balloon-mapping</a><br />
<a href="http://grassrootsmapping.org/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/grassrootsmapping.org');">http://grassrootsmapping.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carmack&#8217;s Reverse: a FOSS patent case study by Patents Roundup: Bad System, Clear Symptoms &#124; Techrights</title>
		<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2011/11/18/carmacks-reverse-a-foss-patent-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-199932</link>
		<dc:creator>Patents Roundup: Bad System, Clear Symptoms &#124; Techrights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/?p=1379#comment-199932</guid>
		<description>[...] Watch covered this as well:  Just a quick one on the subject of open source and patents. John Carmack is well known in gaming [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Watch covered this as well:  Just a quick one on the subject of open source and patents. John Carmack is well known in gaming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carmack&#8217;s Reverse: a FOSS patent case study by Samael</title>
		<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2011/11/18/carmacks-reverse-a-foss-patent-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-198764</link>
		<dc:creator>Samael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/?p=1379#comment-198764</guid>
		<description>From what I have read on the subject it seems that Carmack had publicly discussed the technique prior to the patent being filed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I have read on the subject it seems that Carmack had publicly discussed the technique prior to the patent being filed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

