<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Appeal Court Decision Significantly Strengthens Software Patentability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2008/10/12/uk-appeal-court-decision-significantly-strengthens-software-patentability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2008/10/12/uk-appeal-court-decision-significantly-strengthens-software-patentability/</link>
	<description>open source software innovation support centre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:30:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rowan Wilson</title>
		<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2008/10/12/uk-appeal-court-decision-significantly-strengthens-software-patentability/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Rowan Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/2008/10/12/uk-appeal-court-decision-significantly-strengthens-software-patentability/#comment-171</guid>
		<description>The UK IPO now has a guidance note on how it plans to behave in the light of this decision:

http://www.ipo.gov.uk/pro-types/pro-patent/p-law/p-pn/p-pn-computer.htm

&quot;5. The Intellectual Property Office has previously recognised that an invention which either solves a technical problem external to the computer or solves &quot;a technical problem within the computer&quot; is not excluded. What Symbian has now shown is that improving the operation of a computer by solving a problem arising from the way the computer was programmed - for example, a tendency to crash due to conflicting library program calls - can also be regarded as solving &quot;a technical problem within the computer&quot; if it leads to a more reliable computer. Thus, a program that results in a computer running faster or more reliably may be considered to provide a technical contribution even if the invention solely addresses a problem in the programming.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UK IPO now has a guidance note on how it plans to behave in the light of this decision:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ipo.gov.uk/pro-types/pro-patent/p-law/p-pn/p-pn-computer.htm" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.ipo.gov.uk');">http://www.ipo.gov.uk/pro-types/pro-patent/p-law/p-pn/p-pn-computer.htm</a></p>
<p>&#8220;5. The Intellectual Property Office has previously recognised that an invention which either solves a technical problem external to the computer or solves &#8220;a technical problem within the computer&#8221; is not excluded. What Symbian has now shown is that improving the operation of a computer by solving a problem arising from the way the computer was programmed &#8211; for example, a tendency to crash due to conflicting library program calls &#8211; can also be regarded as solving &#8220;a technical problem within the computer&#8221; if it leads to a more reliable computer. Thus, a program that results in a computer running faster or more reliably may be considered to provide a technical contribution even if the invention solely addresses a problem in the programming.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

