<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s OOXML Wins ISO Approval</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2008/04/02/microsofts-ooxml-wins-iso-approval/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2008/04/02/microsofts-ooxml-wins-iso-approval/</link>
	<description>open source software innovation support centre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:30:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George Bush IS President And Microsoft&#8217;s Office Open XML Format IS An ISO Standard &#171; UK Web Focus</title>
		<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2008/04/02/microsofts-ooxml-wins-iso-approval/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>George Bush IS President And Microsoft&#8217;s Office Open XML Format IS An ISO Standard &#171; UK Web Focus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/2008/04/02/microsofts-ooxml-wins-iso-approval/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>[...] Rowan WIlson on the JISC OSS Watch blog elaborated on these concerns: &#8220;the perception that OOXML is in itself an inadequate standard which has triumphed through Microsoft’s expertise at lobbying ISO member bodies for their votes&#8220;; &#8220;the standard is itself is incredibly long and complex - over six thousand pages&#8221; and &#8220;Microsoft’s patent non-enforcement promise that accompanies [the standard]&#8220;. Similar concerns are described in a Wikipedia entry on OOXML. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rowan WIlson on the JISC OSS Watch blog elaborated on these concerns: &#8220;the perception that OOXML is in itself an inadequate standard which has triumphed through Microsoft’s expertise at lobbying ISO member bodies for their votes&#8220;; &#8220;the standard is itself is incredibly long and complex &#8211; over six thousand pages&#8221; and &#8220;Microsoft’s patent non-enforcement promise that accompanies [the standard]&#8220;. Similar concerns are described in a Wikipedia entry on OOXML. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OSS Watch team blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft, POI and odd distinctions</title>
		<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2008/04/02/microsofts-ooxml-wins-iso-approval/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>OSS Watch team blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft, POI and odd distinctions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/2008/04/02/microsofts-ooxml-wins-iso-approval/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft&#8217;s OOXML Wins ISO Approval [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft&#8217;s OOXML Wins ISO Approval [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lee</title>
		<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2008/04/02/microsofts-ooxml-wins-iso-approval/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/2008/04/02/microsofts-ooxml-wins-iso-approval/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Thanks, your objective analysis calmed me down a lot ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, your objective analysis calmed me down a lot <img src='http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

