<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Sun&#8217;s weblog publisher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2007/08/24/review-of-suns-weblog-publisher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2007/08/24/review-of-suns-weblog-publisher/</link>
	<description>open source software innovation support centre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:30:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CS</title>
		<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2007/08/24/review-of-suns-weblog-publisher/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>CS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/2007/08/24/review-of-suns-weblog-publisher/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been testing Sun&#039;s Weblog Publisher with OOo 3.0 and just recently checked out Word 2007&#039;s blog post.

Sun&#039;s is an easier setup. In Word you need to know your ftp to upload images while in OOo it uploads them to the default directories automatically. That&#039;s great for people that know nothing about ftp; however, everything else is worse than Word 2007&#039;s blog post.

OOo adds more code that shouldn&#039;t be there, formatting of graphics is very poor--everything ends up as &quot;in-line with text&quot; instead of left/right/center as it should be. It even tries to format your paragraphs to &quot;left&quot; instead of just a paragraph mark.

This was a real disappointment! Something like this Sun should have shown how much better they could be over MS, but once again it&#039;s half baked.

If I have access to using Word 2007 blog post Vs OOo +Sun Weblog Publisher I would use Word every time. Sun&#039;s Weblog Publisher doesn&#039;t really save me any time. I&#039;m just going to have to edit the entire post and layout, remove a bunch of bad code. . . well, actually it increases my work!

Just another example of why OOo/StarOffice are years behind MS Office. Apparently the developers just don&#039;t get it?!?!? It&#039;s things like this that really make me scratch my head and wonder why Sun even bothers with OOo/StarOffice. If you aren&#039;t going to be as good as or better and often times much worse. . . why bother?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been testing Sun&#8217;s Weblog Publisher with OOo 3.0 and just recently checked out Word 2007&#8217;s blog post.</p>
<p>Sun&#8217;s is an easier setup. In Word you need to know your ftp to upload images while in OOo it uploads them to the default directories automatically. That&#8217;s great for people that know nothing about ftp; however, everything else is worse than Word 2007&#8217;s blog post.</p>
<p>OOo adds more code that shouldn&#8217;t be there, formatting of graphics is very poor&#8211;everything ends up as &#8220;in-line with text&#8221; instead of left/right/center as it should be. It even tries to format your paragraphs to &#8220;left&#8221; instead of just a paragraph mark.</p>
<p>This was a real disappointment! Something like this Sun should have shown how much better they could be over MS, but once again it&#8217;s half baked.</p>
<p>If I have access to using Word 2007 blog post Vs OOo +Sun Weblog Publisher I would use Word every time. Sun&#8217;s Weblog Publisher doesn&#8217;t really save me any time. I&#8217;m just going to have to edit the entire post and layout, remove a bunch of bad code. . . well, actually it increases my work!</p>
<p>Just another example of why OOo/StarOffice are years behind MS Office. Apparently the developers just don&#8217;t get it?!?!? It&#8217;s things like this that really make me scratch my head and wonder why Sun even bothers with OOo/StarOffice. If you aren&#8217;t going to be as good as or better and often times much worse. . . why bother?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

