<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resolving the &#8220;good but not encyclopedic&#8221; tension on Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2007/02/14/resolving-the-good-but-not-encyclopedic-tension-on-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2007/02/14/resolving-the-good-but-not-encyclopedic-tension-on-wikipedia/</link>
	<description>open source software innovation support centre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:30:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Randy Metcalfe</title>
		<link>http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2007/02/14/resolving-the-good-but-not-encyclopedic-tension-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Metcalfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/2007/02/14/resolving-the-good-but-not-encyclopedic-tension-on-wikipedia/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I suppose &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Dictionary_of_the_English_Language&quot; title=&quot;link to Wikipedia article on Johnson&#039;s dictionary&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the precedent was set by Samuel Johnson in his A Dictionary of the English Language back in 1755&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Dictionary_of_the_English_Language&quot;&gt; Unlike most modern lexicographers, Johnson introduced humour or prejudice into quite a number of his definitions. Among the best known are &quot;Excise: a hateful tax levied upon commodities…&quot;; &quot;Lexicographer: a writer of dictionaries, a harmless drudge…&quot;; and &quot;Oats: a grain which in England is generally given to horses, but in Scotland supports the people&quot; (it ought perhaps to be noted that the latter is arguably a legitimate observation, and moreover is not a significant departure from Bailey&#039;s &quot;a grain, food for horses&quot;).&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Dictionary_of_the_English_Language" title="link to Wikipedia article on Johnson's dictionary" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/en.wikipedia.org');">the precedent was set by Samuel Johnson in his A Dictionary of the English Language back in 1755</a>.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Dictionary_of_the_English_Language"><p> Unlike most modern lexicographers, Johnson introduced humour or prejudice into quite a number of his definitions. Among the best known are &#8220;Excise: a hateful tax levied upon commodities…&#8221;; &#8220;Lexicographer: a writer of dictionaries, a harmless drudge…&#8221;; and &#8220;Oats: a grain which in England is generally given to horses, but in Scotland supports the people&#8221; (it ought perhaps to be noted that the latter is arguably a legitimate observation, and moreover is not a significant departure from Bailey&#8217;s &#8220;a grain, food for horses&#8221;).</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

