Resolving the “good but not encyclopedic” tension on Wikipedia

Wikipedia has a clear vision to be an encyclopedia, but editors are sometimes tempted to leave non-encyclopedic entries because they are witty, funny, well-written or just good. To resolve this tension Wikipedia has the Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense, from which the best is extracted to be kept permanent in a “best of” series.

The Best of Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense is the source of such gems as:

C is for Cookie

C is for Cookie can be regarded as a case study in persuasive oratory, emphasizing the emotional aspect of public speaking. Cookie Monster builds excitement by answering his opening rhetorical question, “Now what starts with the letter C?” with the obvious reply, “Cookie starts with C!” He then challenges the audience, “Let’s think of other things that starts with C,” before quickly replying, “Oh, who cares about the other things?” casually dismissing a whole range of other possibilities as irrelevant. Thus, having ostensibly come for the purpose of covering the letter C in its entirety, Cookie Monster has already focused his agenda exclusively on cookies, employing the classic bait and switch tactic. Several times in his presentation, Cookie Monster emphasizes what appears to be the central thesis of his remarks: “C is for cookie, that’s good enough for me!” The appealing rhythm of this slogan appears designed to entrance listeners, swaying their emotions and making them instinctively want to chant along with him. After rousing the crowd, Cookie Monster systematically lays out the logical underpinnings of his pro-cookie ideology, comparing cookies to round donuts with one bite out of them and to the moon during its crescent phase, in essence using a straw man argument that implies his opponents would advocate the superiority of these competitors over cookies. In this sense, Cookie Monster may be proposing a false dichotomy representing cookies as the only viable choice to a group of obviously inferior alternatives. But before the audience has a chance to catch on, Cookie Monster launches into another round of repetitive chanting, “C is for cookie, that’s good enough for me, yeah!” as young children sing along. Here, Cookie Monster uses a propaganda technique strikingly similar to that employed in George Orwell’s Animal Farm by the pig Napoleon, who trained the farm’s sheep to bleat, “Four legs good, two legs bad” on his cue. Cookie Monster then adds visual stimulation to his discourse by chomping into a large cookie, concluding his remarks with “Umm-umm-umm-umm-umm” and other chewing sounds.

1 Response to “Resolving the “good but not encyclopedic” tension on Wikipedia”


  1. 1 Randy Metcalfe

    I suppose the precedent was set by Samuel Johnson in his A Dictionary of the English Language back in 1755.

    Unlike most modern lexicographers, Johnson introduced humour or prejudice into quite a number of his definitions. Among the best known are “Excise: a hateful tax levied upon commodities…”; “Lexicographer: a writer of dictionaries, a harmless drudge…”; and “Oats: a grain which in England is generally given to horses, but in Scotland supports the people” (it ought perhaps to be noted that the latter is arguably a legitimate observation, and moreover is not a significant departure from Bailey’s “a grain, food for horses”).

Leave a Reply